Skip to main content
  • LAT
  • LIT
  • ENG
udbu
  • Home
  • Products
    • Metalworking Machines
      • Laser Cutting Machines
      • CNC Metalworking Turning Centers
      • CNC Milling Machines
      • Swiss Type CNC Turning and Milling Machines
      • CNC Metalworking Press Brakes
      • Conventional Lathes
      • Conventional Milling Machines
      • Ultrasonic & Precision CNC Machines
    • Woodworking Machines
      • CNC CO2 Laser Cutting Machines
      • CNC Machines
    • Equipment and tools
    • Ventilation equipment
      • Rekuperator
      • Flexible air ducts
      • Air distribution collectors
      • Difuzors
      • Other materials
    • AEON
    • Bellini
    • Bernardo
    • Borunte
    • Conprofe
    • Flott
    • Gdw
    • Golden Laser
      • Sheet laser cutting machine
      • Tube laser cutting machines
    • Hanwha
    • Holzmann
    • Kafo
    • Oxygen
    • Pinacho
    • Putsch
    • Roeders
    • Ronix
    • Samchully
    • Seoam
    • SMEC
    • Warcom
    • Xtool
    • Yg-1
  • Automation
  • Service
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • +371 68688313
  • +370 66106190
  • +372 6346313

When Seco and Sandvik truly justify their price — and where YG-1 becomes more cost-effective

May 15, 2026 at 3:49 pm

Gemini_Generated_Image_4iawl74iawl74iaw.jpgWhen Seco and Sandvik truly justify their price — and where YG-1 becomes more cost-effective

In the metal cutting tools market, there has long been a common belief: if you want a “serious” result — choose Seco Tools or Sandvik Coromant.
And indeed — these manufacturers offer very high stability, durability, and productivity.

However, in real production, the key question is almost always part cost.
And this is exactly where the Korean YG-1 often becomes significantly more economical in many applications.

When Seco and Sandvik are truly worth their price

Premium inserts are expensive not just because of the brand name.

The main advantage is coating technology and stable geometry. For example, Seco uses its proprietary Duratomic technology, which increases wear resistance at high temperatures and cutting speeds.

What this brings to production:

  • higher cutting speeds;

  • more predictable wear;

  • longer life per cutting edge;

  • fewer machine stops for tool changes;

  • stable part quality in serial production.

This is especially noticeable in:

  • large batch production;

  • 24/7 machining;

  • automated lines;

  • machining difficult materials;

  • situations where every machine stop is costly.

In such conditions, the more expensive insert truly pays for itself — not through purchase price, but through reduced downtime and higher output.

Where YG-1 becomes economically advantageous

However, not every workshop operates under ideal conditions.

In many real-world tasks, inserts do not manage to use their full “premium” potential because other factors damage the tool:

  • insufficient machine rigidity;

  • vibration;

  • oxide scale;

  • interrupted cutting;

  • impact loads;

  • unstable material;

  • suboptimal cutting parameters.

And this raises the key question:

if a premium insert breaks just as quickly as a cheaper alternative, why overpay?

The price difference is significant

On average, YG-1 inserts cost about 40–50% less than comparable Seco or Sandvik inserts.

When machining:

  • mild steel;

  • aluminum;

  • simple parts;

  • small batches,

the difference in tool life is often minimal.

This means:

  • part quality remains the same;

  • tool life differs only slightly;

  • but tooling costs are almost cut in half.

That is why many companies gradually switch to YG-1 in operations where there is no sense in paying extra for “reserve performance” that is not actually utilized.

The most common mistake when choosing inserts

Many people evaluate tooling based only on purchase price.

But what really matters is cost per part.

Sometimes a tool is 50% more expensive but lasts twice as long — then it is more economical.

But sometimes the opposite happens:

  • a premium insert lasts only 10–15% longer;

  • but costs almost twice as much.

In that case, the economics clearly favor YG-1.

When switching to YG-1 makes the most sense

YG-1 is often the best choice if:

  • machine rigidity is moderate;

  • interrupted turning occurs;

  • workpieces have scale;

  • tools are exposed to impact loads;

  • universal (not aggressive) cutting parameters are used;

  • reducing cost is more important than maximizing cutting speed.

For many small and medium-sized manufacturers, this is the everyday reality.

Conclusion

If Seco or Sandvik inserts perform long, stable, and predictable in your process — switching them purely for minor savings usually does not make sense.

However, if tools regularly:

  • chip;

  • break;

  • wear out quickly due to harsh conditions;

  • fail to utilize their full lifespan,

then switching to YG-1 can reduce tooling costs by almost half without a noticeable loss in performance.

How to understand whether YG-1 is right for your shop

To accurately estimate the economics for your workshop, answer just three questions:

  • How many minutes of actual cutting time (or how many parts) does one Seco cutting edge currently last?

  • What material are you machining: stainless steel, mild steel, or cast iron?

  • Do the inserts wear gradually, or do they tend to chip and fail prematurely?

After that, it becomes possible to objectively compare cost per part and determine whether switching to YG-1 will bring real savings in your production.

Recent Posts

  • When Seco and Sandvik truly justify their price — and where YG-1 becomes more cost-effective
    15. May 2026
  • How to Choose Cutting Parameters for Stainless Steel Machining on SMEC CNC Machines
    14. May 2026
  • 5 Signs That Your Workshop Air Cleaning System Needs Modernization
    13. May 2026
  • UDBU Begins Cooperation with FAIRINO in Industrial Robotics
    12. May 2026
  • Adaptive Milling Strategies in CAM Systems: Tables, Parameters, and Comparison of Fusion 360, NX, and Mastercam
    22. Apr 2026
  • How to Choose Between an Industrial Robot and a Cobot in Metalworking
    17. Apr 2026
  • Oil Mist Collectors for Small Workshops: Optimal Solutions on a Limited Budget
    9. Apr 2026
Список изображений
Логотип Aeon Логотип Bellini Логотип Bernardo Логотип Conprofe Логотип Flott Логотип GDW Логотип Golden Laser Логотип Hanwha Логотип Holzmann Логотип Kafo Логотип Pinacho Логотип Putsch Meniconi Логотип Roeders Логотип Samchully Логотип Seoam Логотип Smec Логотип Warcom Логотип Xtool Логотип YG-1

          Cart

          Cart is empty.

          • Golden Laser
          • SMEC
          • Service
          • Contact
          • +371 68688313
          • +370 66106190
          • +372 6346313
          • About us
          © 2026 udbu.eu